The babble of a middle-aged lunatic.
If you cant beat them, kill them.
Published on September 29, 2006 By Xythe In Current Events
It seems as relatives belonging of the Iraqi judge presiding over Saddam Husseins genocide trial has been slain in yet another attempt to have Saddams trial relocated to another country. His defence counsel, 3 of which have been murdered, have been claiming the Iraqi courts are bias and Hussein is not getting a fair trial.

Imagine that!

My feeling is they should have assassinated this bastard long ago. That would be the quickest way to end his trial, and that might just be the most fair of all in the eyes of his victims families.

The entire article can be read here>

Comments
on Sep 29, 2006
I'm sure the peaceful Muslims couldn't have anything to do with it. It was probably Bush.
on Sep 29, 2006

I'm sure the peaceful Muslims couldn't have anything to do with it.

Excuse me?  Where are they?  Just curious.

on Sep 29, 2006
Excuse me? Where are they? Just curious.


Well I haven't actually seen any but I keep hearing about them. Usually from themselves.
on Sep 29, 2006
it's a little know fact that President Bush is a secret Muslim and belongs to the shiites sect.. that is why Sadamn cannot get a fair trial.




link to any of colgangrenes blogs. proof positive I tell ya.
on Sep 29, 2006
Well I haven't actually seen any but I keep hearing about them. Usually from themselves.


I think the FBI should put out an APB for them!
on Sep 29, 2006
It's too bad Saddam didn't have as much "honor" as his sons. The coward should have died in a rat hole, by a grenade carrying the inscription "From America with Love".
on Sep 29, 2006
The coward should have died in a rat hole, by a grenade carrying the inscription "From America with Love".


Better he be torn limb from limb by his...loyal subjects.
on Sep 29, 2006
Saddam was never motivated by religion. Why would his faction's assassinations be considered "Muslim Terror"? It's like saying Hitler was a Catholic terrorist.
on Sep 29, 2006
Saddam was never motivated by religion. Why would his faction's assassinations be considered "Muslim Terror"?


Really?

Did Saddam Hussein's inner circle and the Taliban rulers in Afghanistan actively court each other in hopes of forging an anti-American alliance in the region?

In this second of a three-part examination of a newly-released document captured in Iraq, Robison offers further evidence that in 1999 the Taliban welcomed "Islamic relations with Iraq" to mediate among the Taliban, the Northern Alliance and Russia, and that the Taliban reciprocated with an invitation to Iraqi officials to visit Afghanistan.

Read it here Link

on Sep 29, 2006
Did Saddam Hussein's inner circle and the Taliban rulers in Afghanistan actively court each other in hopes of forging an anti-American alliance in the region?


Maybe? I don't see how it matters. If it did exist it was an anti-American alliance, not a meeting to discuss the key issues in Islam. I can't think of a single Muslim cleric who agreed with Saddam's approach to faith, nor does the assassination of the judges suggest it was a religiously motivated crime. I think it's far more likely Saddam is using secular contacts to get his kills; the Shi'ia never liked him and the Sunni hardly respected his piety. I don't see why they'd get involved for the likes of him.
on Sep 29, 2006
I don't see why they'd get involved for the likes of him.


Money?
Weeding out the infidel?