The babble of a middle-aged lunatic.
To bone or not to bone.
Published on October 22, 2006 By Xythe In Current Events
Twenty-six year old Patrick McPhail of Spanaway, Washington was caught on their back porch while "giving the dog a bone" Wednesday night.

Mrs McPhail took some snapshots with her trusty cell-phone of the zoosexual encounter between her husband and their 4 year old pitbull, then called the sheriffs department.

Patrick is the first person to be charged under the new Washington beastiality law, and has been charged with felony animal cruelty.

These kinds of charges always intrigue me. How on earth does a person get charged with animal cruelty, whe the alleged victim cannot testify that the act was in itsef cruel. It seems to me a mature pitbull is more than equipped to "refuse" sex with a person, should the dog feel he/she is not being "pleased".

On the other hand, I wonder what prompted Mr. McPhail to choose his loving dog over his wife for his Wednesday back porch liason with Fido the pitbull.

I guess Mrs. McPhail might have been a little jealous of the sceen; the dog was taken by animal control.

Anyway, Patrick was released on $20K bail and now awaits his precident setting trial. Be sure Washington is going to make an example of this dog lover. Sometimes it doesn't pay to love your dog.

For the record, beastiality, like homosexuality, does not reside as a pathology on the American Psychiatric list of mental disorders.


You can read the Seattle Times article by clicking the link below.

Comments (Page 4)
4 PagesFirst 2 3 4 
on Nov 06, 2006
I provided the link to your original statement, DoN, and quoted it verbatim. How is that lying?


You quoted it out of context. Which is a form of lying. I can do the same. Here is a direct quote to you on post #33:

an animal can be buggered in a non-abusive way.


So you said an animal can be sodomized in a good way. Hmmmmmm......Now I see how really sick you are.

But I will also state that I quoted you out of context, because unlike you, I am not a liar. Nice try cyber stalker!   

on Nov 06, 2006
You, on the other hand, posted a partial sentence, but I suppose the difference is too subtle for your reptilian brain to grasp.


Oooohhh! I am wounded to the quick by LW's juvenile name calling (again).  

Taking one sentence from an article, with others that would convey the meaning, is taking out of context. I thought you were smarter than that. But then I have been known to be mistaken in the past.
on Nov 06, 2006
Can you say Baaaa'aahhh Jennifer?


Are you a sheep now LW?   

Keep digging your grave. You may reach china yet! But you are getting boring, as usual. Your hystrionics are stale and old, and your lying has not improved. IN this case, the old dog (sheep) cannot learn any new tricks. Nice non-communicating with your closemindedness.
on Nov 06, 2006
How 'bout no one has sex with animals...then we can all get some rest.

~Zoo
on Nov 06, 2006
How 'bout no one has sex with animals...then we can all get some rest.


Here here! A very intelligent post! One that is succint, and to the point.

Find a human, offer them chocolate and if you hit it off, go for it! Sounds good to me!

(Am I forgiven for my chocolate answer? )
on Nov 06, 2006
I'm still unconvinced by Xythe's contention that bestiality is no worse than homosexuality, despite his... convincing... argument that there must be people out there who can miraculously gauge consent in animals.




I'm sorry Cacto if I led you to believe that some people can gauge consent in animals. What I'm trying to say is:



I personally do not know how animals consent to anything, sexual contact or otherwise.



I do not have the expertize to gauge this, nor the capacity to know any animals mental machine.



Persoanlly, I hold that homosexuality is actually worst in the long haul. I'll say this firstly because it's simply rare to my knowledge. Homosexuality is far more prevalent in society than beastiality.
on Nov 07, 2006
Xythe: Everyone's entitled to their prejudices. I guess we now know one of yours.

At least you no longer appear to be in favour of animal molestation by those with the magical gift of knowing consent.
on Nov 07, 2006
Xythe: Everyone's entitled to their prejudices. I guess we now know one of yours.


Fair enough.

At least you no longer appear to be in favour of animal molestation by those with the magical gift of knowing consent.


Never thought I was. At least Im quite glad you see it that way now Cacto
4 PagesFirst 2 3 4