The babble of a middle-aged lunatic.
Women getting off easy.
Published on October 3, 2006 By Xythe In Entertainment

Linda Masse, a Laconia NH resident was charged with attempted assault, resisting arrest and criminal mischief after attacking her husband with an axe. The couple had been drinking when Mr. Masse declared he wanted to leave his wife, during an argument over their marriage.

The violence erupted when Masse grabbed a collector’s axe off the wall, and started to chase Mr. Masse around the house screaming that she was going to kill him.

The courts have defines the axe Masse was wielding as a weapon that could cause serious harm or death. Mrs. Masse in court referred to this lethal weapon as a toy.

Not only did Mrs. Masse vandalize her husbands’ car, she also destroyed several household articles, including a glass door.

Mr. Masse made his escape from his enraged, axe-wielding wife by running across the street to a neighbor’s house, locking the door, and calling the police.

The neighbor Jennifer Morrill says she saw the entire event from the start: "I saw the whole thing," Morrill said. "She went quiet for five minutes, and all of a sudden, she just cracked and went at him with an ax." She also says, "I was trying to convince her to put it down, but she wasn't listening to anybody."

Linda Masse was combative and resistive police say during her arrest and transport.

 

Well, it seems to me that because Masse is a woman, the charges placed upon her are quite lenient for her crimes.

Understand, this woman erupted violently, grabbed a lethal weapon of the wall, and chased her husband around the house until he could make his escape to a neighbor’s home and call police. She destroyed property both inside the house and Mr. Masses car outside with her "toy axe". She gave the police a bunch of flak and resisted her arrest.

And what? She is charged with attempted assault, resisting arrest and criminal mischief? WTF?

Chasing somebody around the house while swinging a deadly weapon, and damaging property during the chase is hardly an attempt at assault. It's straight up assault. Criminal mischief? A misdemeanor? You have got to be kidding me.

If any man had committed these criminal acts, he would undoubtedly be charged with Assault with the intent to commit bodily harm, assault with a dangerous/deadly weapon, maybe even attempted murder, and lastly without a doubt SPOUSAL ABUSE and DOMESTIC VIOLENCE! A man would not see daylight for at least 5 years - at LEAST.

Unfortunately this seems to be just another case of women getting off easy and yet another example of gender-bias in the courtroom.

It appears that justice really is blind, at least when it comes to female criminal behavior.

 

You can read the entire fiasco by clicking the link below.


Comments (Page 3)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Oct 04, 2006
Do you really want me to quote statistics for you...Here goes...


You are arguing apples and oranges. He is not arguing that more women are abused. You are arguing they are. he is just saying, tit for tat, women are getting lighter charges (not even sentences) for the same crime.

And I find your defense kind of funny. But that is just me.
on Oct 04, 2006
Can you show me something that verifies your statements; from a small local office?


One. I never said the office was small--you're showing your bias by the assumptions you make. Two, I only statement that I made in my first comment was the nearly 1/3--that's a DOJ statistic. You can find it in this report: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/fvs06.pdf The rest was me giving anecdotal evidence of this statistic playing out in real life.

As for the name calling--I believe you opened the door to turning this conversation nasty when you stated:
you would go to the ends of the earth, shake an ass, cry a river to make it like I was. I have come to that acceptance
Not only was that a sexist, rude and condescending statement, but it in no way reflects reality.

on Oct 04, 2006
You are arguing apples and oranges. He is not arguing that more women are abused. You are arguing they are. he is just saying, tit for tat, women are getting lighter charges (not even sentences) for the same crime.


No, I'm arguing everyone is getting lighter sentences than they deserve. 45% of family violence perps get less than 2 years--when these crimes were committed against strangers, more than 75% of perps got more than two years.

This isn't about gender--it's about not taking DV seriously.


And I find your defense kind of funny. But that is just me.

Which part, Dr. Guy? The part where I mentioned that I went to funerals of dead clients because we weren't successful in getting them out of the relationship in time.

Personally, I find nothing amusing about this topic.

on Oct 04, 2006
One. I never said the office was small--you're showing your bias by the assumptions you make.


I spent time working in a Domestic Violence center and safe home.


Now I know I must really be out in left field when I assume that a "Domestic Violence center and safe home" is small as compared to the entire nation, right? I could also mention that rather me showing my bias, you amplify your own, due to the fact that you woked in a safe house, and I assume, for women. Call me crazy for this assumption as well, but I have never seen a DV safehouse for men. In fact thats an interesting point. Is there a safe house for men?

As for the name calling--I believe you opened the door to turning this conversation nasty when you stated:


Do you see where I called anybody any names? I dont. But I do see where you did:

I'm done here--you are free to remain as narrowminded and ignorant as you'd like.


Also interesting to note that this is not the first time you either said or eluded to being finished with this thread. Yet, you have made around four more posts.

So you jump on Wahines bandwagon, insult me on MY OWN BLOG, and contradict yourself. Is this an example of how females behave. No, just you.

No, I'm arguing everyone is getting lighter sentences than they deserve.


Still this seems as you are trying to divert my point to one of your own. Say it how you will, and I respond with, "Eventhough everyone is getting lighter sentances, women get the lightest of all". I was asked to substantiate my statements and I did. Now, can you substantiate any claim that sais Im wrong with respect to the topic at hand?

Personally, I find nothing amusing about this topic.


I find your attitue quite amusing, and I'm certain the doc does as well.

Now if you would calm down and relax, perhaps we can lay of the sarcasm and condecention and argue the topic at hand like adults.

Putting my best foot forward, I will apologize for any inflamitory or provoking statements. It takes a man to break the ice JK

on Oct 05, 2006
Ok, Im not gonna go through all the mumbo jumbo replies. Just the op. I see what you are talking about Xythe and what your point was. If it had been a man, then I agree the charges would have been more extreme.


Now hush, to all the rest of you who want to protest. I know and understand that daily , men and women, are getting off easily for many different crimes. Or not being held accountable for what they have done.



Im strictly speaking about this certain circumstance. We all know that it would have been different if the man had done that to her.


And it is sad, as a woman I will say this, that there are times, where a woman can be the cause of DV and have the man arrested for it. I had a friend once that worked as one of my crew memebers. I would hang out at his house at times with him and his fiance. She would get screwed up on drugs right in front of their baby. He would yell at her about needing to be a more responsible parent. She would become offended and get to a point in her anger where she would throw things at him , and hit him. He would take it ...He might try to restrain her at times..but nothing in retaliation or fighting back...The cops would be called by neighbors, and he would be hauled off why she is screaming DV like bloody hell....Used to piss me off. Come to find out from her (they lived in a small town ) but anyways..she admitted that she had slept with half the police force, and had even dealt some drugs to them. In return, they were at her beck and call. So if they showed up to their house, she was always proclaimed innocent while my friend was hauled away...



So you see, I understant exactly what you are trying to say and portray through this article. And I dont see you hating on women, or being a possible threat lol. Cant even believe those statements were posted...lamers...but anyways...Here is a woman that understands the "other side" of things in life.
on Oct 05, 2006
get to a point in her anger where she would throw things at him


Very common. Women like to through things.

He might try to restrain her at times..but nothing in retaliation or fighting back...The cops would be called by neighbors, and he would be hauled off why she is screaming DV like bloody hell....


This is what I'm talking about!!

And I dont see you hating on women, or being a possible threat lol.


Thats because you were not offended to see that members of your gennder are not perfect. Your not a man hater. See, if a guy exploits womens criminal behaviour, they get offended. These are the women who dont want people to know what some women really are, but rather keep to the illusion that they are all peaches and cream.

You are a liberated women and can see what equality really is, and seems that your attitue strives for REAL equality. A nice objective comment Pure.
on Oct 05, 2006
You are a liberated women and can see what equality really is, and seems that your attitue strives for REAL equality. A nice objective comment Pure.


No problem.

Well, as sad and as dispicable as things may be in the world we live in today, you have to accept it for what it is. Women have to remember that many years ago we cried out for equality, and we got it. Now that we have it, many want dont want to accept it for what it is.


Sometimes, I am ashamed to be associated with the female sex ( not that I want to be a man lol ), but because of how many act. They cry out about how women are treated, and the pains of the world that they must bare. Always "woe is us"..UH WAKE UP!!! Think of all the scenarios out there where women cry out that a man ( or men ) have done wrong , and I can think of a time when a woman (women) was (were) the cause of the same thing. Women want to cry about how big of arseholes men are, when I can turn around and show you just as many b*tches So stop accusing every man that points something out about the female sex, as an unsensitive, women hating prick... We are not innocent, and I am sure I can go to many post in JU where women complained about a man, and instead of the female responders claiming that the Poster was a "man hating " person, they gave her sympathy and "poor you".



Look, we are all human. We may not have the same perspecives on life, due to what sex we are. But, we are still human, and share the same emotions, the same line of thought ( on a basic level, and if you can't understand what I mean, then dont try. It's obviously too deep for you),and we generally react the same way to situations..( Whether that person shows their true feelings/ thoughts or not ) ....unfortunately, a lot of women seem to take everything too personal, and cant see things for what they are..


Ok..once more..that is all for me on this topic... And if you are going to argue with me for what I say..dont bother, I wont be around to read it...



on Oct 05, 2006
Now if you would calm down and relax, perhaps we can lay of the sarcasm and condecention and argue the topic at hand like adults.


Yes shades, get back in the kitchen and bake me some pie, there's a good girl.

...


Call me crazy for this assumption as well, but I have never seen a DV safehouse for men. In fact thats an interesting point. Is there a safe house for men?


Yes. There are, at least in the bigger cities anyway. But with only 7% of total DV crime being against men (according to shades' figures) there wouldn't be many. I imagine they get 'found' less often by violent women too. There've been a few cases in just the last few years in my town where womens shelters have come under serious attack from men, in one case with a firebomb.

Men are much, much less likely to need armed guards to maintain their safety and so their shelters are smaller and less well-known. The one in my town is basically little more than a house, rather than the security-staffed compound where the women are protected. I did some volunteer work at a male shelter a few years back and it was pretty easy. It certainly had nothing in common with the horror stories I heard from the womens shelter staff at the pub.

Eventhough everyone is getting lighter sentances, women get the lightest of all".


She did point out that women were actually getting heavier sentences than men when cases went to trial. Did you see that? Perhaps your attention was distracted by something shiny. Don't worry - it happens to me all the time.

Very common. Women like to through things.


Yes, and like all men I like killing small animals because Men like to hunt things.

I mean, really. You make the most ridiculous generalisations about people and pretend you're being fair-minded because you're presenting 'both sides of the argument'. Really you're just as biased as the systemic biases you allege.
on Oct 05, 2006
Yes shades, get back in the kitchen and bake me some pie, there's a good girl.


Why, so she can through it at me? Not that I really mind shades, but I am rather fond of apple. Oh, and dont worry, I won't have you charged with assault

Thanks Cacto for a nice freash breath of humor.

There've been a few cases in just the last few years in my town where womens shelters have come under serious attack from men, in one case with a firebomb.


I met a women who was staying in one of these safehouses a few years back. Till then, I never knew they existed. Personally, I'm glad they do, and I know they are needed. There are a lot of crazy people out there.

She did point out that women were actually getting heavier sentences than men when cases went to trial. Did you see that? Perhaps your attention was distracted by something shiny. Don't worry - it happens to me all the time.


I did see that, but honestly, its off topic as as I mentioned, even though women may be getting heavier sentences, statistically, they are still shorter than the sentences of men for the same crimes.

I know what you mean about the distraction as well, and admit at certain points of this thread I may have been distracted. I hope you noticed that I acknowledged that with amends. I'm not a woman hater, I just made an opinion in my blog.



Very common. Women like to through things.Yes, and like all men I like killing small animals because Men like to hunt things.I mean, really. You make the most ridiculous generalisations about people and pretend you're being fair-minded because you're presenting 'both sides of the argument'. Really you're just as biased as the systemic biases you allege.


From my experiance, this is the way it is. I have seen many women throw things at the men they are arguing heavily with. I have experience it as well. You see it depited in movies all the time, and even in cartoons. Its simply my opinion from my experience. Men are more apt to punch walls from my experience. In my youth, I have done this. But you miss the point. This thread concerns female bias in the courtroom, and women recieving lighter sentances than men for the same crimes, not personal bias, which I assume all people hold some. While I hold sympathy for all victims of violent crimes including women, I do NOT agree with courtroom bias and the lessor sentances.
on Oct 05, 2006
You are right. I did say that I was done with this thread--but then I changed my mind. My perogative, right.

Anyway, I'm too busy baking cacto's pie to really participate in this thread , but I did want to mention a case than happened just yesterday in Maryland.

Back in August, a woman went to a judge to get a restraining order against her boyfriend due to domestic abuse. The judge denied the order--meaning that the boyfriend got off completely--no warning, no nothing.

The woman was murdered by her boyfriend, in her own home, yesterday morning.

I saw the story on Fox News last night--I don't have time to search for a link right now.

At the end of the day, the system is failing--and that's the saddest part of all.

on Oct 05, 2006
That's assault with a deadly weapon...at the very least. Probably attempted murder if you could push it...I for one do not chase people around with my "toy" sword, which I assure you is very sharp.

~Zoo
on Oct 05, 2006
That's assault with a deadly weapon...at the very least.


Thays my point Zoo. Assault with a deadly with intent to commit bodily harm is the smallest charge for this crime. A reasonable conviction might be say Aggravated Assault with a sentence of 1 yr county, 9 months suspended. That means the lady would be locked down for at least a month, and eligible for parole after 1 month; a maximum stay of 3 months.
on Oct 05, 2006
You are right. I did say that I was done with this thread--but then I changed my mind. My perogative, right.


As long as you are able to leave a post here, it's your perogative. I'm glad you chose to change your mind

Back in August, a woman went to a judge to get a restraining order against her boyfriend due to domestic abuse. The judge denied the order--meaning that the boyfriend got off completely--no warning, no nothing.


This is not uncommon Shades, and I understand what your point is. This is why I was very impressed when I first heard of these safehouses. I also find it enlightening that law enforcement give these safehouses a fair amount of leeway.

Statistically, women just straight up kill their domestic partner. Men never have a chance to even file for a restraining order. This might be demonstrated by the woman with the axe, should she had connected with her husband. Its not to oftem men use weapon in the original domestic confrontation, but rather employ their hands (not deadly).

I don't have time to search for a link right now.


No need. as I mentioned, this is not really all that uncommon.

Anyway, this man will end up with violating his restraining order, and either murder_1 or manslaughter_1. He wont be back for a long while - if ever.

At the end of the day, the system is failing--and that's the saddest part of all.


You wont get any argument out of me here. I'm guessing that more people are either injured or killed by their domestic partner than any other violent crimes; Sad indeed.

3 Pages1 2 3